I was talking with a client last week. Smart guy. Experienced. Running a company that’s doing well by most measures.

And he said something I’ve been hearing a lot lately.

Not that decisions are harder, exactly.
They just feel heavier.

There are more of them. They’re closer together. There’s less time between a choice and the consequences of it. And there’s this nagging feeling that he’s moving fast, but he can’t quite tell if he’s moving well.

He’s not confused. He’s not in over his head.
It’s more like the conditions changed, and the way he’s always thought about decisions hasn’t quite caught up yet.

I think he’s noticing something real.

When Nothing Breaks, But Things Stop Lining Up

Most leadership breakdowns I see right now don’t come from bad decisions.

They come from small misalignments that add up.

You make a decision that’s mostly aligned with what matters. Then another that’s a little less so. Nothing breaks. The business keeps moving. Revenue still looks fine.

Six months later, you’re dealing with problems that only exist because those earlier decisions compounded in ways you didn’t fully see at the time – extra meetings, second-guessing, rework, people pulling in slightly different directions.

Nothing collapsed.
Things just stopped lining up.

I think of this as drift. And the reason it’s so expensive is because it’s subtle.

At a certain size, drift doesn’t just come from the decisions you make, it comes from the decisions others make using your authority but not your full context.

You can stay productive while becoming incoherent. You can keep moving while slowly losing the thread of why you’re moving in the first place. And because nothing fails all at once, the feedback that would normally tell you something’s off shows up late.

What Changed Without Us Noticing

Leadership has always involved uncertainty. That part isn’t new.

What is new is how dense it’s become.

More decisions per day. More tools involved in each one. More stakeholders tied to every outcome. More second-order effects you’re expected to think through before you act. AI offering leverage while also adding another layer of choice about when and how to use it.

The distance between action and consequence is shrinking. Visibility is higher. The expectation that you’ll be clear before you move hasn’t adjusted to match the pace.

That’s the gap.

The Performance Everyone Expects (And No One Can Sustain)

There’s something else I don’t think we talk about enough.

There’s real pressure right now to appear certain, even when certainty isn’t actually available.

I understand why. Teams want direction. Stakeholders want confidence. Markets don’t reward hesitation.

But over time, that pressure does something subtle.

It narrows perception. It makes reflection feel risky. It rewards speed over coherence. And it makes it harder to revise a decision later without it looking like you didn’t know what you were doing in the first place.

Eventually, you stop trusting your own signal. You lean on momentum, consensus, or whatever promises to decide for you.

That’s not a character flaw. It’s an adaptive response to an environment asking for something that often isn’t possible.

It’s still risky.

When judgment gets outsourced, drift accelerates.

What the Steady Leaders Do Differently

The leaders I see navigating this well don’t necessarily move slower.

They think cleaner.

What I mean by that is they’ve built conditions that let their thinking slow down without slowing the organization itself.

That usually looks like a few things:

They’ve protected space where uncertainty can actually be explored without being punished. Not a crisis meeting. Not a presentation. Just somewhere they can think.

They have ways of surfacing blind spots early. A thinking partner. A framework. A regular review that asks, “What did I miss?” It’s systematic, not occasional.

They distinguish between decisions that need speed and decisions that need clarity, and they protect the second category even when everything feels urgent.

They use tools. They listen to people. But they don’t give up their own judgment about what matters.

Over time, that builds something like internal steadiness.

Not “I know I’m right,” but “I know how I think, what I’m optimizing for, and where I need to slow down before things get expensive.”

That steadiness holds when things get messy.

Why Clarity Is Becoming an Asset

As systems scale and tools accelerate, clarity itself becomes leverage – because it travels further than you do.

Not clarity as certainty.
Clarity as orientation.

Knowing what actually matters to you. Understanding the tradeoffs you’re truly willing to make. Recognizing when speed helps and when it hurts. Staying aligned with intent as context shifts.

Leaders who protect that kind of clarity reduce rework. They reduce trust erosion. They avoid paying for decisions that didn’t age well.

That’s not philosophical.
That’s economic.

Every time you revisit a decision that wasn’t really aligned with what mattered, you’re paying compound interest on drift.

The Questions Worth Sitting With

There’s no formula for this. The conditions are too different, and what works for one leader won’t work for another.

But as things continue to speed up, a few questions feel worth asking:

  • Where does your thinking slow down enough to catch drift before it compounds?
  • What helps you stay aligned when decisions stack faster than you can fully process them?
  • Who – or what – helps you think without requiring you to perform certainty while you’re doing it?
  • How well does your thinking hold up once it leaves you?

They’re not easy questions. And the answers won’t be the same for everyone.

But the ability to ask them, and to create conditions where you can actually answer them, matters more than it used to.

Leadership right now isn’t just about choosing well in the moment.

It’s about making choices you can still stand behind when everything changes.

Latest posts by Paul Boomer (see all)